Jump to content
XT1S6715-2.jpg
 
© Vic Chapman 2015

XT1S6715-2.jpg

veejaycee

Fuji 90mm f2, 1/320 @ f2, ISO 200, - 1.0 ev, small crop.


Copyright

© Vic Chapman 2015

Photo Information for XT1S6715-2.jpg


Recommended Comments

Vic, both pictures of the deer are very nice. You beautifully rendered the light of the forest and its ambiance (indeed the 90mm has a beautiful bokeh). I particularly like this image both because of the pose of the belling deer and of its composition that leaves some more space around the subject (and especially below his legs).

A part from their aesthetic merits, I am quite impressed that you managed to take such pictures with the 90mm. How close were you to the beast? As soon as I saw these images I thought you took them with your 55-200mm. 

Share this comment


Link to comment

HI Marco and thank you for commenting,

the deer are wild but they are used to people passing by (Richmond Park). They will usually move off if approached or in some cases during the rut, they may charge but over the years when shooting in the forest I developed a way of approaching them as if walking past rather than heading directly towards.

Distance was 15M - 18M. Even when using the 55-200mm (which was actually fitted to my XP1) I tend to leave a little extra space around the animal to show some of the environment.

I'm pleased you chose to comment because I wasn't sure how they appeared to other eyes. The 90mm lens is really sharp with great bokeh but more importantly is the way it transitions from sharpness to oof bokeh. It seemed to me that I could be looking at a photo of a diorama. I have seen such photos where a stuffed animal is too sharp against the false bg so when I looked at my own pictures I worried they perhaps had a similar look.

Vic

Share this comment


Link to comment

Vic, thank you for the info. Being able to walk in such beautiful parks must be a refreshing and, as you show, a photographically rewarding experience.

As far as the 90mm goes, the more pictures I see that were made with it (especially by real photographers, rather than testers/reviewers), the more I am convinced it is a gem of a lens. Sharpness a part, its overall rendering and, as clearly visible in your picture above, the three-dimensionality it gives to its images make it a truly standout lens. 

Share this comment


Link to comment

Beautiful images.   It's very difficult for me to understand why men kill these magnificent creatures for sport.  Hunting with a camera is my style 

Share this comment


Link to comment

In 20 years living in Richmond I never found any antlers in the park, have you Veejaycee? And , Oh yes, love the photos. 

Share this comment


Link to comment

No and I've looked but always expected a park ranger would confiscate any I found. I expect they check for dropped antlers to collect and sell for knife/brolly handles and such because they actually belong to Crown estates/Royal parks commission and I expect ultimately, to ER II. Not only have I never found any in Richmond park but I never saw anyone else with any either. I used to find huge mushrooms in the park and would take one or two home but a few years ago I saw what was obviously a large family or gang, I suspect from E Europe, doing a sweep and picking everything. Now you'll see signs warning people to not take from the park even the various chestnuts, cobnuts and the like which are all food for the wildlife including red and fallow deer.

I've been shooting the red deer rut for many years and there is not much new for me there and red deer stags without antlers look docile and stupid. I keep going there in the hope of finding the heavy horses working in the forests but now, to cut costs the Royal parks have cut their numbers and share what's left with all the Royal parks.

Until a cycling accident 5 years ago, most weekends I used to cycle from home near the Crystal Palace end of Streatham common to Richmond Park, do a road circuit followed by a circuit of the perimeter track/footpath before leaving via Robin hood gate and cross country over Wimbledon Common then back home uphill all the way.

Share this comment


Link to comment

Sounds like a great ride.  I bet you miss it.  The parks of London are unique indeed and for town dwellers to have open space photo oportunities is remarkable.  Thanks King Charles II, thanks for opening your parks to the population.   For many years I cycled to/from work throuh Richmond Park, Barnes Common, Kensington Gardens, Hyde Park and Green Park. Wish I had my light weight XT1 in those days.  Never took my heavy DSLR but here is a w/e shot, misty sunrise in Bushy Park.

I did ask the Richmond Park game warden what they do with deer shot during culling.  He said thay sold the venison to Germany because they paid the most.

Bushy Park.jpg

Share this comment


Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

    • LCM_Scott
      By LCM_Scott
      The Fujifilm Film Simulations are hands down one of the main things that keeps me coming back to the brand. It is by far one of the most fun things to tinker with while shooting and really increases my enjoyment out in the field. 
      I have been shooting alot less with my X-T1 lately and have been enjoying my X100F far more but here are a few examples of the film simulations I have enjoyed using from my X-T1 and still use while shooting my X100F. 
      Classic Chrome:

      Monochrome:

      Velvia/Vivid: 

      Pop Color:

      I threw in the over saturated Pop Color example because although its unrealistic for most real world shooting applications it can still be fun and provide some interesting results!
    • Kroogle
      By Kroogle
      I'm considering migrating from a crop-frame DSLR (Nikon D90) to the well-loved mirrorless world of Fuji X. The impetus is my upcoming honeymoon, where we'll be taking our dream vacation to New Zealand and French Polynesia. I can hardly wait to get my eyes on those beautiful landscapes!
      I was looking at full-frame cameras from Nikon and Canon, but after spending an hour with a work colleague who's maniacal in his love for the X100 series, I've changed course. The challenges I face with my current DSLR (bulky for travel/hiking, multiple lenses but never change them, too much effort to let photos happen organically or take the camera out regularly), seem to be addressed with these smaller, but just as powerful, cameras. As I read more, my excitement increased - people are obsessed with the Fuji color, sensor, and engineering.
      I do have a few questions before I make the switch.
      For landscape photography, am I sacrificing up anything major by not going full-frame? Have you been satisfied with your shots in this area? X-T2 vs. X100F - is there one that you would recommend based on my anticipated usage? About me: mid-30's outdoor lover, photo enthusiast, loves photography for travel and capturing lifelong memories of friends/family/moments. As I mentioned, I'm pretty much sold on the smaller profile since I know I'll use the camera more often (vs. pulling out my phone), just wondering about image quality for this once-in-a-lifetime trip! Thanks in advance.
    • veejaycee
      By veejaycee
      XT1, XT20, XT2, XP2, X100F, GFX 50S, plus XT2 manual vers 2
      All links here: http://www.fujirumors.com/fujifilm-releases-new-kaizen-firmware-for-fujifilm-x-t2-x-pro2-and-gfx-50s/
×
×
  • Create New...